View Selected Publication

Select another publication number to view citation:   
Citation for publication number 916:
Watson, Alan E., Cordell, Ken, Manning, Robert, Martin, Steven. The Evolution of Wilderness Social Science and Future Research to Protect Experiences, Resources, and Societal Benefits. Journal of Forestry. 114(3) 329-338.
Leopold Publication Number 916
Download this publication (174 KB)
Not available to order


Abstract:
     The historic Wilderness Act celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2014, and wilderness social science shared a similar legacy. As paradoxical as it might seem, humans are an important part of wilderness, helping to define the very concept and representing an important component of wilderness use and management. Much of the past five decades of wilderness-related social science has focused on recreational use, documenting the impacts of recreation on wilderness resources and the quality of the wilderness experience, exploring application of the concept of recreational carrying capacity to wilderness, and developing planning and management frameworks for balancing the inherent tension between wilderness use and protecting the quality of wilderness resources and the experience of visiting wilderness. The Limits of Acceptable Change and related planning frameworks, including formulation of recreation-related indicators and standards, continues to help guide wilderness management today. Other programs of social science research have developed protocols for measuring and monitoring wilderness recreation, defined the root causes of conflict among wilderness users and identified management approaches to minimize this conflict, explored the appropriate and acceptable use of fees for wilderness use, and identified a growing suite of wilderness values. All of these programs of research and others that could not be included in this review article have helped guide wilderness management and policy. However, social science research has evolved as a function of changes in both wilderness and society. This evolution continues through a focus on public attitudes toward adaptation to climate change, public attitudes toward restoration in wilderness to correct past human intervention, appropriate use of technology in wilderness, and issues related to the relevance of wilderness in light of changes in society and use of public lands. This article tells the story of these changes in issues and the relationship between wilderness and the American people. Management and Policy Implications: The US Congress established the National Wilderness Preservation System in 1964, and it has steadily grown from about 9 million acres to nearly 110 million acres today. Congress also allocated funds for creation of a wilderness research program in 1967 to support management and policy decisionmaking. Wilderness science has provided data to support management decisions and management frameworks to accomplish resource and experience protection through use limits, education, zoning and fees, and other means. In the future, wilderness social science will respond to new challenges with provision of information to support decisions about intervention to adapt to climate change influences, restoration of conditions affected by previous human activities, management of changes in technology and new uses that may threaten wilderness experiences, the relevance of wilderness to an increasingly diverse and urban population, and exploration of the vulnerability of ecosystem services and associated benefits flowing from wilderness due to changes in climate, policy, and land use. New topics that have emerged will require adjustment of the federally funded research program and stimulation of academic research and training programs that are responsive to the needs for knowledge identified.